Wednesday, April 3, 2013

Rock'n Primates



Walking down the main road of the sanctuary where I volunteer, I often hear the rhythmic drumming of chimpanzees and think it would be fun to make a music album.  It would be wild, but full of spirit.  Those chimps seem to enjoy the repeating beats and honestly with an electric guitar it would sound fantastic!  After reading the summary of a recent study conducted at the Primate Research Institute at Kyoto University, I am comforted in this idea that chimps can rock'n roll.
Researchers trained a group of three chimpanzees to hit keys on a keyboard and played distractor sounds as they were doing it.  A female then aligned her tapping to the distractor sound.  Although, this may not sound like much and more research is warranted, it could mean that humans are not the only ones who are able to synchronize sound with movement.

On the same subject, I recommend a very entertaining article from Psychology Today entitled "Why Chimpanzees Would Dance to Johnny Cash's Music" in which we meet a very unusual musician by the name of Harry Hmura head of "Musicians for Apes" who played for chimpanzees in a sanctuary outside of Montreal.  He recalls how Toby (a chimpanzee) started swaying his head back and forth to the rhythm of the strumming and even began to "sing".  He also played for orangutans in Florida and their reaction was different - they sat and listened very intently, interested in the guitar.

A rescued chimp playing a toy piano:


As the old saying goes: "Music has charms that soothes the savage beast"!

Monday, January 14, 2013

Great Apes and Theory of Mind

I really love finding articles related to the theory of mind and how it applies to great apes.
I just found this article about orangutans and how they are able to communicate with gestures with the humans who work with them - modifying their gestures if they assess their message has not been clearly understood.
http://www.cosmosmagazine.com/news/1517/orangutans-communicate-with-charades

In a paper published in 2007, Zimmerman et al write about primates able to point distally at objects or places (not necessarily food) they want access to.  Pointing is not a natural behavior seen in the wild, but can come naturally to language-trained great apes.  In experiments, some were able to guide humans to places where an object was hidden, if they saw the human was not able to locate it at first attempt.
http://www.eva.mpg.de/psycho/pdf/Publications_2009_PDF/Zimmermann_et_al_2009.pdf

In a paper published in 2008, Call and Tomasello of the Plank Institute assess the studies performed with great apes and the question posed by Premack and Woodruff 30 years prior: "Does the Chimpanzee Have a Theory of Mind?" with a resounding "yes", but it is different than the theory of mind of humans.
http://email.eva.mpg.de/~tomas/pdf/TICS30.pdf



Apes self-awareness - part 1

Apes self-awareness - part 2


Robert Sapolsky speaks about Theory of Mind


Good reads!

Wednesday, November 28, 2012

Do Apes Need Psychologists?

Emotions are not the privilege of human beings.  Animals exhibit a wide array of emotions, but none so much as our "cousins" the great apes.

They can be happy...



They can be sad...


They can enjoy peaceful moments...


And according to a recent study, they can also experience midlife crisis.

So, I went to the Medicine.net site and looked it up.  A "midlife crisis" is defined as "A period of personal emotional turmoil and coping challenges that some people encounter when they reach middle age, accompanied by a desire for change in their lives, brought on by fears and anxieties about growing older. "
For humans, this phenomenon can happen anytime around the age of 45 until we are  either old enough to have gained wisdom and find a renewed sense of wellbeing or too old to remember what we were feeling unhappy about.  (I started at 12, hoping the rest of my life would be a cruise but I haven't gained enough wisdom to end it yet.)
Since I am not a psychologist, my understanding of the cause of this change some of us are doomed to go through is very simplified and probably would cause more than one experts to tear their hair out.  Anyway, we start young and enthusiastic, we go through many many challenges, realize we don't control our fate the way we thought we could magically do it when we were 10 and BLAH, midlife crisis is here!  That's because as Jung put it so eloquently: "We cannot live the afternoon of life according to the program of life's morning; for what in the morning was true will in evening become a lie."
From what I read here and there in popular magazines, it seems that the causes for a midlife crisis vary from person to person, it can be a tragic life event or simply boredom, aging, hormonal changes (andropause / menopause).

It is the same for great apes?
The authors of a paper published this month and entitled "Evidence for a "Midlife Crisis" in Great Apes Consistent with the U-Shape in Human Well-Being" find that the causes maybe rooted in biology more than in economic and sociological factors.  They explain that, based on studies conducted over 20 years all over the world, there is strong evidence that human happiness follows a U-shape with the most happiness early and late in life and the lowest point in midlife for both males and females.  The authors conducted well-being surveys of 508 aging great apes (chimpanzees, orangutans) in zoos and sanctuaries in the U.S., Japan, Canada, Singapore and Australia.  All were rated on their moods, social interactions, activity level and well-being by keepers who knew them for at least 2 years.  All displayed signs of midlife crisis between the ages of 28 and 35.  This is the first study on well-being conducted with non-human primates.  If socioeconomic factors are not the only ones playing a role in midlife crisis, then biological and evolutionary factors must be at play.  Why do apes (like humans) get happier again later in life?  If unhappy apes die sooner than other better adjusted apes their age, this could explain a higher level of well-being with the older population.  It is also possible both apes and humans experience age-related changes in the brain areas associated with well-being the same way.  The authors' suggestion is to conduct studies in the area of neurodevelopment shared by humans and great apes.

Click here to check out the University of Warwick press release and download the article in PDF format.

Saturday, October 6, 2012

Holding Hands

We use them every day, yet we do not realize how much we rely on them. Hands are a wonderful thing. They help us feel the world, take things, prepare food, create tools, build houses, feed ourselves, communicate and express love or dislike with a slap.

Michel de Montaigne expressed it very well when he wrote: “Behold the hands, how they promise, conjure, appeal, menace, pray, supplicate, refuse, beckon, interrogate, admire, confess, cringe, instruct, command, mock and what not besides, with a variation and multiplication of variation which makes the tongue envious.

Many expressions used in common language refer to them - such as: "healing hands", "he's putty in her hands", "a show of hands", "in good hands", "to give a hand", "helping hands" to list but a few.

They are mentioned in songs, like in this old French one from Charles Trenet: "Place your hand in my hand, your heart against my heart and tell me if there is any more charming way of being happy...).  Not to mention the Beatles' hit "I Wanna Hold Your Hand" famous the world over.


This is why I want to spend a few minutes writing about hands and the differences between human and non-human primate hands.

Looking at the pictures below, you will notice that humans have a much longer thumb than most primates and our feet (of which we are not going to speak about today) have lost the opposability of the big toe, which in turns provides for more stability - an adaptation to bipedal locomotion.


The use of our hands and the evolution of two typical human handgrips, identified by JR Napier, are believed to have played an important role in the survival of our species.  These are the "precision grip" (most useful for throwing objects) and the "power grip" (most useful for hitting with clubs).  (Journal of Anatony, 2003 - Richard W. Young - "Evolution of the Human Hand: The Role of Throwing and Clubbing")

Human hands have the most mobile thumb of all primates (you can touch the tip of your thumb to the tip of your auricular finger) - this is what enables us to have "precision grip".

Humans have straighter fingers compared to primates.  Chimpanzees have hands (probably very similar to those of our early ancestors) with a short relatively weak immobile thumb, elongated carpal and metacarpal bones.  The third and fourth metacarpal are very strong and used for knuckle walking.  The proximal and middle phalanges are curved toward the palm, which is useful for arboreal locomotion.  Their fingertips are cone-shaped.

As a matter of fact, primate hands and feet evolved differently for different primates.  If you look at the hands and feet of baboons, for instance, they look kind of similar. Their hands and feet share many functions for grasping and propulsion.  Gibbons have hands and feet most adapted to suspensory behavior and vertical climbing.  Spider monkeys have an underdeveloped (quasi non-existent) thumb and long curved fingers. Their hands are most adapted to brachiation. They are not as dexterous as capuchin monkeys whose hands are close to ours.

All monkeys have nails instead of claws (except the lemur who still has a toilet claw on its feet).  This enhances their sense of touch.

"The primate hand is a remarkable invention and one that helped forge a new relationship between the animal and its environment.... The baboons' nimble fingers were into everything, plucking grass blades, digging up roots, selecting the tiniest herb pecking out of the ground cover... Their hands had both power and precision; the opposability of the thumb and fingers was as essential here on the savannah as it had been millions of years ago when tiny ancestral primates climbed into the forest canopy.  Some foods had to be excavated from rock-hard ground, others had to be peeled or seeded."  ("Almost Humans - A Journey Into the World of Baboons" - Shirley C. Strum)  
Much like us, non-human primates use their hands to accomplish a multitude of tasks - locomotion, feeding, changing the shape of objects to create tools (the use of a rock to crack a nut), scratching, grabbing, slapping (lemurs are big slappers), grooming.
Grooming is extremely important, it is the social glue in primate societies (including ours - who doesn't like a good massage?) Grooming helps individuals reconcile, form alliances, develop friendships.  Females groom a new mother in the hope of being granted the right to hold her infant.  It is used for courtship, to cement bonds between family and clan/group members, as well as soothing a grieving member.  All this would not be as efficient without hands.

Finally, hands are essential for humans and non-human primates to communicate with each other.  In the 1960s, baby chimps were trained to use sign language; Koko is famous for pointing at symbols on a board and expressing her thoughts and desire pretty clearly to her human team.  This is not surprising, since many studies show that sensory information travels from the hands to the brain.  This is why some researchers, like Virginia Berninger, professor of educational psychology at the University of Washington, are big advocates of handwriting for children as well as aging folks.  When we hold a pen, large regions of the brain involved in thinking, language and memory are activated.  When a young chimp learns how to hold a twig to fish out termites, the same regions light up.  

So, next time you hold a hammer, make sure to keep your fingers out of the way.   Love your hands!










Sunday, June 24, 2012

Will the Rio Summit Help Primates?

A lot has been written about the 2012 Rio Summit that just ended on June 22, yet not much optimism was expressed.  For many, this is just a repeat of the past summits and not much is expected to come out of it.  So, here are some highlights.  

According to an article published in Business Standard, "the world leaders in their declaration said they recognized the crucial importance of enhancing financial support from all sources for sustainable development for all countries, in particular developing nations." ... "We further stress the importance of cooperative action n technology innovation, research and development.  We agree to explore modalities in the relevant forums for enhanced access to environmentally sound technologies by developing countries."  

The San Francisco Gate wrote about the Hollywood celebrities who attended and spoke about biodiversity.  The article quotes Greenpeace Executive Director kumi Naidoo who speaking about the ongoing assault the Arctic is going through is campaigning for a ban on offshore oil drilling and unstainable fishing.  

Because there aren't any clear regulations for the management of the oceans, for instance, when deep sea drilling is allowed and accidents happen, we ought to seriously ask who will ultimately be  held responsible for damages to the ecosystem and loss of species? 

Jane Goodall addressed attendees at the meeting held by Avoided Deforestation Partners.  Her message continues to the be same: "Help the chimps", but it is not only about helping the chimps, it is about helping people in "desperate poverty". 


As stated by Washington Post "The world's forests are among the crucial, life-sustaining environmental systems scientists say are teetering on the brink of a tipping point.  The U.N.'s Environment Program warned earlier this month that the planet's systems - which also include air, land and oceans - 'are being pushed towards their biophysical limits,' after which sudden and catastrophic changes could ensue."  In the same Washington Post article, we can read about Prince Charles' concerns about the growing human population.  You can also see a video of Prince Charles talking about how the world is "sleep walking to climate catastrophe" in The Telegraph.



The disappearance of tigers, wolves, chimpanzees, other primates, honey bees and so many other species, is slowly but surely putting the survival of humans at risk.  So what solutions can we come up with to save ourselves?

The Power of Convergence and Collaboration - hope for the future!





 


Friday, April 13, 2012

Stress and Health

We have all heard that stress can have harmful effects on our health.  The CDC published a paper entitled "The Effects of Childhood Stress on Health Across The Lifespan" which outlines that, although beneficial in small doses, stress can have very detrimental effects on those who have been exposed to it repeatedly from a very young age.  Abused and neglected children are particularly at risk.  Toxic stress can affect brain development, the immune system, learning and memorization.  It also increases a person's risk of depression, substance abuse and suicide into adulthood.
Toxic stress includes bullying and there again, the effects on the victims' health are long lasting.
According to a study conducted across a sample of 3,000 adults and published in the Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, those who were bullied as children do suffer emotionally and physically as adults.  Symptoms vary and include depression, anxiety, fatigue, pain and frequent colds.
The reason seems to be linked to the fact that stress forces the body to produce high levels of cortisol and adrenaline - thereby increasing heart rate, causing digestive upsets, tight muscles, among other things.

How does this relate to monkeys?

Well, because Duke University just released results of a study related to status and stress in rhesus macaques.  This study focused on the physical effects of stress on the lowest ranking animals in a group.  The last individuals introduced into a social group is always lowest ranking and exposed to threats more often than other members of the group.  They can be slapped, kicked and bitten, which causes a lot of stress.  By collecting blood samples, researchers saw huge differences in the genes related to the good functioning of the immune system of the low ranking animals compared to high ranking ones.  When the same individuals achieved a higher status in their respective groups, their sense of well-being improved and so did their immune system.  For more information, you can read: Changes in Monkeys' Social Status Affect Their Genes published in ScienceDaily.

How does this translate in the workplace for humans?  Although individuals with a high status in society have better health than those who are unemployed and struggle financially, being the boss does not mean one is healthier according to a paper from 2008 entitled "Do People Become Healthier after Being Promoted?"  Of course, there are many factors to be taken into consideration.

The subject is not exhausted and more studies are needed.  However, for humans there is no question in my mind that being poor and having a low social status definitely affect how we see ourselves and whether or not we can afford health care.

Monday, February 27, 2012

Humans vs. Chimps

Are humans smarter than chimpanzees or vice-versa?
It has been established for quite some time that great apes have a theory of mind.  They can relate to others, anticipate on their actions or perceived thoughts - like a chimpanzee pretending to be looking for a treat in a part of the enclosure where she knows the treat isn't in order to induce another chimp in error.

Pushed by curiosity and a fascination with our fellow primates, we, humans, have dedicated a lot of time and thought to compare ourselves to them.  I recently stumbled upon a serious (yet funny for us in 2012) article in 1902 in Pearsons' Magazine, which dealt with the similarities of human babies compared to primate babies.  The goal was to explain the theory of evolution and the author (Sydney Savory Buckman - geologist and palaeontologist 1860-1929) was trying to prove that humans did descend from an extinct monkey-like ancestor.  He was careful to emphasize:  "A man cannot be descended from his cousins who are living, but he is descended from his ancestors who are dead.  And the now living monkeys stand to man as cousins, or collaterals, but in no wise as ancestors."  He went on to outline what he considered proofs.  I cannot help but quote some of these here: "A character in which a baby so much resembles a monkey is its face.  Aristotle noticed that all babies were snub-nosed, which is correct.  And this snub-nose, which is about as broad as it is long, and has the end cut off obliquely, showing two wide nostrils which seem to open almost straight into the head, is a character which goes back to quite a low form of monkey."  I must admit I would never have thought of this!  Here is another quote: "The baby has the power to move its toes independently - that wriggling of the toes so often commented upon by mothers. This form of movement is a heritage from those ancestors who, like modern monkeys, would have used the fingers of their hind feet as we do the fingers of our hands."  He then explained the strength babies exhibit when sustaining their bodies with their arms as a remnant of the time our ancestors were tree dwelling, that babies like to sleep on their bellies much like quadrumani, all of this illustrated with pictures of monkeys and babies in similar poses.


Today researchers continue to study primates and compare them to humans - much like in the following videos which I found quite interesting.



Chimpanzee vs. Human Child Learning

Amazing Apes: Self-awareness


Experiments with altruism in children and chimps

ABC news, chimps vs. humans

Chimpanzee culture and learning

Hope you enjoyed these.  Please let me know!

 
html web counter
free html web counter